usda logo
AIPL RESEARCH REPORT
SCC9 (3-08)

Somatic cell counts of milk from Dairy Herd Improvement herds during 2007

R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, and L.L.M. Thornton
Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS-USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
301-504-8334 (voice) ~ 301-504-8092 (fax) ~ rlaipl@aipl.arsusda.gov ~ http://aipl.arsusda.gov

Test-day data from all herds enrolled in Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) somatic cell testing during 2007 (94% of all DHI herds) were examined to assess the status of national milk quality. All test-day data within a herd were included regardless of breed; data from owner-sampler herds were included as well. Data from cows with records that failed some Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL) editing procedures were excluded. Somatic cell score (SCS) is reported to AIPL as part of an individual cow's test-day yield information. It was converted back to SCC in cells/milliliter [SCC = 2(SCS–3) × 100,000] for calculating herd and State averages.

Table 1 shows the total number of herd test days, the average number of cows (with usable records) per herd on test day, the average test-day milk yield and SCC, and the percentages of herd test days that exceeded four levels of SCC (750,000, 600,000, 500,000, and 400,000 cells/ml) for each State during 2007. The current legal limit for bulk tank SCC is 750,000 cells/ml for Grade A producers; the lower limits shown have been proposed on a number of occasions as future maximums by the National Mastitis Council. An interesting development is that California lowered their state standard for legal milk to 600,000 cells/ml. State and national average daily milk yields were weighted by the number of cows per herd test day. Herd, State, and national average SCC's were based on SCC's from individual cows that were weighted by milk yield on test day. Percentages of herd test days by level of SCC are for herd test days that included records of at least ten cows. Nationally, average SCC during 2007 was 276,000 cells/ml, which is considerably lower (by 12,000 cells/ml) than last year. A majority of states (27) had lower average SCC than last year; 21 states had higher.

Variation among States (Table 1) was large. State average SCC's were often lower than the national average in the Northeast, upper Midwest, and the far West and higher in the Southeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Central states, a finding consistent with previous reports. Although climatic conditions (temperature and humidity) surely contributed to regional SCC differences, differences between adjacent states were substantial, suggesting mastitis-control practices are impacting State differences as well.

Corresponding averages for earlier years 1995 through 2007 are in Table 2. This is the third year in a row that SCC has declined. It has improved for five of the last six years, declining from a high of 322,000 cells/ml in 2001. The percentage of herd test days that exceeded 750,000, 600,000, 500,000, and 400,000 cells/ml during 2007 was 3.5, 7.6, 13.4, and 24.0, respectively. The overall percentage of herd test days exceeding all levels were lower than in 2006. In 2007, 3.5% of test days from DHI herds that participated in somatic cell testing were higher than the present legal limit for SCC of bulk tank milk. This percentage may overestimate the percentage of herds that shipped milk exceeding the legal limit for bulk tank SCC on test day because the milk of cows treated for mastitis is excluded from the bulk tank even though included in DHI test data. Also, the percentage of herd test days that exceeded the legal limit would have been higher than the percentage of herds that were rejected from the market because market exclusion only occurs after repeat violations.

Herd size and average daily milk yield have been increasing over the period reported (Table 2). The large increase in cows per herd for 2005 to 2006 (90.3 vs. 115.5 was due in part to a change in policy of accepting records missing sire identification into the national database. The increase in cows per herd between 2006 and 2007 was substantial (115.5 vs. 125.1). The decline in SCC over the last six years is encouraging; hopefully average SCC will continue to decline in the future due to both improved management practices and genetic selection. The trends for lower percentage of herd test days above three thresholds (600,000, 500,000 and 400,000 cells/ml) is likewise encouraging. The concerted effort to improve milk quality needs to continue. State and national SCC's in DHI will continue to be summarized annually so changes in SCC and implications to milk quality can be monitored.

Table 3 provides milk yield and SCC by estimated herd size. As herd size increased, average daily milk generally increased, and average SCC declined until herd size exceeded 3000 cows. The most disturbing result is the percentage of test days with over 750,000 cells/ml. For herds with less than 50 cows, this occurred 5.9% of the time. It occurred on only 2.0% and only 1.3% of the test days for herds with 50 to 99 and 100 to 149 cows, respectively, and averaged 0.7% of the test days for the remaining large herds.

Table 4 provides the same statistics for all herds by month. The seasonal pattern of milk quality is illustrated in Figure 1. Milk yield per cow was highest in the late winter and spring. Milk yield declined during the summer months. SCC increased from May through August, then decreased from September through December. The highest quality milk was produced in October, November, and December.


Table 1. Characteristics of DHI herd test days for milk yield and SCC of milk by State during 2007.

SCC characteristics  
  Herd test days1 Cows2 per herd Average daily milk yield Average SCC Herd test days3 with SCC greater than
State (no.) (no.) (lbs) (cells/ml, 1000's) 750,000 cells/ml
(%)
600,000 cells/ml
(%)
500,000 cells/ml
(%)
400,000 cells/ml
(%)
Alabama 238 122.3 50.6 407 4.2 10.1 22.7 42.9
Arizona 264 1451.6 69.6 257 0.0 0.8 1.9 7.6
Arkansas 329 108.4 55.1 441 15.8 24.9 35.6 53.5
California 9,327 702.0 73.9 253 2.4 4.8 7.7 13.7
Colorado 343 689.0 69.3 268 1.2 3.5 7.9 14.3
Connecticut 807 92.6 67.5 285 3.6 6.7 11.5 20.0
Delaware 251 116.2 68.3 320 2.4 4.4 8.8 20.3
Florida 222 755.6 69.0 333 8.6 18.5 27.0 50.9
Georgia 1,134 134.7 61.2 422 6.7 17.8 31.7 51.8
Idaho 1,718 684.9 75.5 255 1.7 3.8 8.1 14.7
Illinois 4,427 86.0 69.5 294 3.0 7.4 13.9 26.7
Indiana 3,621 84.8 69.1 306 4.6 9.6 15.6 28.6
Iowa 8,918 91.9 71.0 304 4.2 9.6 16.3 29.3
Kansas 2,021 95.7 66.6 360 6.8 14.4 22.8 37.9
Kentucky 1,721 79.8 63.3 354 6.0 14.3 23.8 39.7
Louisiana 448 106.2 51.2 446 13.6 29.0 42.4 60.7
Maine 1,208 72.3 63.7 267 3.1 6.5 12.7 21.5
Maryland 3,616 80.3 66.3 284 3.3 7.4 12.3 22.2
Massachusetts 831 79.2 68.2 276 2.0 5.2 9.7 17.9
Michigan 7,678 151.4 78.1 247 2.3 4.8 8.6 16.5
Minnesota 25,131 78.6 69.9 320 4.7 10.3 18.1 31.3
Mississippi 336 162.6 64.9 337 2.4 10.4 18.2 41.1
Missouri 3,399 65.5 58.3 356 6.9 13.7 21.8 36.5
Montana 400 115.9 75.2 200 0.0 0.5 2.0 6.3
Nebraska 1,591 127.0 68.1 331 6.2 12.5 21.5 36.0
Nevada 116 540.5 78.3 306 7.8 7.8 11.2 12.9
New Hampshire 873 84.5 69.9 245 1.8 4.2 8.4 17.1
New Jersey 565 63.8 65.8 344 4.4 10.3 18.6 33.3
New Mexico 255 1391.4 70.8 289 5.5 7.1 12.9 19.2
New York 20,265 112.4 71.2 258 2.4 5.8 11.0 20.5
North Carolina 1,644 125.8 68.2 324 2.0 6.1 12.9 26.9
North Dakota 384 88.2 69.3 320 2.1 4.2 10.7 22.4
Ohio 8,534 89.1 68.8 317 3.6 8.1 14.9 26.7
Oklahoma 582 123.6 57.9 343 6.7 15.1 27.5 44.3
Oregon 2,255 154.4 67.6 228 2.8 4.6 7.6 12.0
Pennsylvania 42,727 59.4 69.4 296 3.0 7.2 13.2 24.1
Puerto Rico 956 110.5 36.1 499 18.5 30.3 45.5 63.4
Rhode Island 41 73.0 62.6 160 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8
South Carolina 538 161.2 62.8 355 2.0 5.2 12.3 33.1
South Dakota 1,372 154.3 71.2 288 5.4 12.7 22.2 36.2
Tennessee 1,525 86.7 59.6 418 5.2 14.8 27.6 49.6
Texas 1,563 396.4 61.5 318 2.8 6.5 12.5 26.2
Utah 1,397 163.8 69.0 242 2.6 4.8 8.3 16.7
Vermont 3,478 101.0 67.6 230 1.5 3.5 6.7 13.6
Virginia 4,034 107.3 68.5 309 2.0 5.6 10.9 23.8
Washington 1,842 240.5 74.4 237 2.0 2.9 4.6 8.7
West Virginia 409 84.8 60.1 324 3.7 8.3 18.8 33.0
Wisconsin 52,264 80.9 74.5 258 3.3 6.7 11.2 19.8
Wyoming 28 162.5 70.9 320 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1
United States 227,626 125.1 71.4 276 3.5 7.6 13.4 24.0

1All herd test days with usable records.
2Cows with usable records (less than total cows on test).
3Herd test days with ≥10 usable records.

Table 2. National averages of herd test days for milk yield and SCC of milk by year.

SCC characteristics  
  Herd test days1 Cows2 per herd Average daily milk yield Average SCC Herd test days3 with SCC greater than
Year (no.) (no.) (lbs) (cells/ml, 1000's) 750,000 cells/ml
(%)
600,000 cells/ml
(%)
500,000 cells/ml
(%)
400,000 cells/ml
(%)
1995 265,844 50.0 65.3 304 4.1 9.3 16.0 27.2
1996 255,039 55.5 64.7 308 4.1 9.2 16.1 27.8
1997 287,789 57.4 66.4 314 4.2 9.5 16.6 28.8
1998 283,695 60.8 66.8 318 4.5 10.1 17.8 30.3
1999 273,364 67.0 68.2 311 4.3 9.7 17.1 29.8
2000 260,139 73.3 69.1 316 4.1 9.4 16.8 29.5
2001 244,940 79.1 69.0 322 4.9 10.6 18.2 31.1
20024 267,809 77.5 69.5 320 5.6 11.0 18.1 30.0
2003 251,182 80.5 69.6 319 5.6 11.2 18.4 30.4
2004 240,938 85.7 69.4 295 4.7 9.4 15.5 26.4
2005 234,585 90.3 71.1 296 4.7 9.2 15.3 25.8
20065 236,191 115.5 71.2 288 3.9 8.3 14.3 25.2
2007 227,626 125.1 71.4 276 3.5 7.6 13.4 24.0
Annual trend -3,853 5.4*** 0.5*** -2.1* 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3

1All herd test days with usable records.
2Cows with usable records (less than total cows on test).
3Herd test days with ≥10 usable records.
4Summary characteristics for 2002 were recalculated to include more complete data than was available at the time of initial reporting.
5Cows per herd included those records missing sire identification starting in 2006; they were not included in prior years.
*The linear regression was significant with P ≤ .05
**The linear regression was significant with P ≤ .01
***The linear regression was significant with P ≤ .001

Table 3. Characteristics of DHI herd test days for milk yield and SCC during 2007 by herd size.

SCC characteristics by herd size  
Herd size1 Herd test days2 Cows3 per herd Average daily milk yield Average SCC Herd test days4 with SCC greater than
(cows) (no.) (no.) (lbs) (cells/ml, 1000's) 750,000 cells/ml
(%)
600,000 cells/ml
(%)
500,000 cells/ml
(%)
400,000 cells/ml
(%)
<50 102,909 29.1 62.5 316 5.9 11.3 17.9 28.5
50 - 99 69,230 69.1 66.9 300 2.0 5.9 12.0 23.8
100 - 149 20,132 120.4 67.8 284 1.3 4.0 8.7 19.2
150 - 199 9,273 172.3 70.0 277 0.7 3.1 7.1 17.4
200 - 299 8,642 242.8 71.4 273 0.6 2.3 6.3 15.9
300 - 499 7,495 385.4 74.1 267 0.7 2.0 4.6 12.1
500 - 999 5,763 688.8 75.8 266 1.0 2.7 5.3 12.5
1000 - 1999 3,004 1364.3 76.0 261 0.5 1.3 3.3 9.5
2000 - 2999 741 2441.3 75.1 243 0.5 0.9 1.9 6.3
>3000 437 4136.8 75.3 253 0.0 0.5 2.5 5.7
All herds 227,626 125.1 71.4 276 3.5 7.6 13.4 24.0

1Number of cows reported in milk.
2All herd test days with usable records.
3Cows with usable records (less than total cows on test).
4Herd test days with ≥10 usable records.

Table 4. Characteristics of DHI herd test days for milk yield and SCC during 2007 by month.

SCC seasonal characteristics  
  Herd test days1 Cows2 per herd Average daily milk yield Average SCC Herd test days3 with SCC greater than
Month (no.) (no.) (lbs) (cells/ml, 1000's) 750,000 cells/ml
(%)
600,000 cells/ml
(%)
500,000 cells/ml
(%)
400,000 cells/ml
(%)
January 19,092 121.1 71.8 280 3.4 7.3 12.5 22.4
February 18,030 124.1 72.0 284 3.7 7.5 13.0 22.9
March 20,499 125.4 72.4 284 3.6 7.8 13.5 23.9
April 18,726 125.6 72.7 275 3.4 7.2 12.7 22.6
May 19,398 124.6 73.1 271 3.0 6.4 11.5 21.6
June 19,227 124.4 72.4 279 3.4 7.5 13.2 23.9
July 18,630 123.7 71.4 290 4.3 9.4 16.3 28.3
August 18,813 126.9 70.4 297 4.9 10.6 18.5 31.1
September 18,759 125.6 69.3 284 3.8 8.7 15.2 27.2
October 18,908 126.3 69.4 266 3.3 7.7 13.6 24.4
November 18,820 126.2 70.1 250 2.5 5.7 10.5 19.8
December 18,724 127.0 71.3 246 2.5 5.8 10.4 19.8
Yearly 227,626 125.1 71.4 276 3.5 7.6 13.4 24.0

1All herd test days with usable records.
2Cows with usable records (less than total cows on test).
3Herd test days with ≥10 usable records.

Figure 1. Average daily milk yield and SCC during 2007 by month.

SCC seasonal characteristics  
Plot of mmilk * mos