usda logo
AIPL RESEARCH REPORT
SCC5 (2-04)

Somatic cell counts of milk from Dairy Herd Improvement herds during 2003

R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, and A.H. Sanders
Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS-USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
301-504-8334 (voice) ~ 301-504-8092 (fax) ~ rlaipl@aipl.arsusda.gov ~ http://aipl.arsusda.gov

Test-day data from all herds enrolled in Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) somatic cell testing during 2003 (93% of all DHI herds) were examined to assess the status of national milk quality. All test-day data within a herd were included regardless of breed; data from owner-sampler herds were included as well. Data from cows with records that failed Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL) editing procedures (for example, no sire identification) were excluded. However, an earlier report showed that the somatic cell counts (SCC's) of milk from such cows did not differ from those from the other cows in the herd. Somatic cell score (SCS) is reported to AIPL as part of an individual cow's test-day yield information and was converted back to SCC in cells/milliliter [SCC = 2(SCS–3) × 100,000] for calculating herd and State averages.

Table 1 shows the total number of herd test days, the average number of cows (with usable records) per herd on test day, the average milk yield and SCC, and the percentages of herd test days that exceeded four levels of SCC (750,000, 600,000, 500,000, and 400,000 cells/ml) for each State during 2003. The current legal limit for bulk tank SCC is 750,000 cells/ml for Grade A producers; the lower limits shown have been proposed as future maximums. State and national average daily milk yields were weighted by the number of cows per herd test day. Herd, State, and national average SCC's were based on SCC's from individual cows that were weighted by milk yield on test day. Percentages of herd test days by level of SCC are for herd test days that included records of at least ten cows.

Nationally, average SCC during 2003 was 319,000 cells/ml, which was lower than the national average of 320,000 cells/ml for 2002. Corresponding averages for 1995 through 2002 (Table 2) ranged from 304,000, to 322,000, and the overall trend has been for an increase in SCC of 1700, annually. The percentage of herd test days that exceeded 750,000, 600,000, 500,000, and 400,000 cells/ml during 2003 was 5.6, 11.2, 18.4 and 30.4, respectively. Thus, 5.6% of test days from DHI herds that participated in somatic cell testing are higher than the present legal limit for SCC of bulk tank milk. This percentage may overestimate the percentage of herds that exceeded the legal limit for bulk tank SCC on test day because the milk of cows treated for mastitis is excluded from the bulk tank but included in DHI test data. Also, the percentage of herd test days that exceeded the legal limit would have been higher than the percentage of herds that were rejected from the market because market exclusion only occurs after repeat violations.

Variation among States (Table 1) was large. Average SCC's were lower in the far West and higher in the Southeast; a finding consistent with previous reports. Although climatic conditions (temperature and humidity) probably contributed to regional SCC differences, SCC differences between geographically adjacent states were substantial, which suggests that mastitis-control regimens have an impact under similar climatic conditions. Although the overall percentage of herd test days exceeding 750,000 cells/ml was the same in 2002 as 2003 (Table 2), fewer states had greater than 5% of herd test days over this limit, showing that progress has been made in some areas.

Herd size and average daily milk yield have been increasing since 1995 (Table 2). Overall, the results for SCC raise concern that the quality of U.S. milk is not improving. Although changes from 2002 to 2003 were small, the trends for increasing percentage of herd test days above all four thresholds (750,000, 600,000, 500,000 and 400,000 cells/ml) were significant at P ≤.01. Greater efforts to improve milk quality are essential. State and national SCC's will continue to be summarized annually so that changes in SCC and implications to milk quality can be monitored.


Table 1. Characteristics of DHI herd test days for milk yield and SCC during 2003, by State.

SCC characteristics  
  Herd test days1 Cows2 per herd Average daily milk yield Average SCC Herd test days3 with SCC greater than
State (no.) (no.) (lbs) (cells/ml, 1000's) 750,000 cells/ml
(%)
600,000 cells/ml
(%)
500,000 cells/ml
(%)
400,000 cells/ml
(%)
Alabama 312 100.2 51.4 517 12.5 28.5 45.8 66.7
Arizona 366 671.8 67.0 353 5.5 9.6 16.7 32.0
Arkansas 367 67.3 56.7 387 8.7 17.2 27.5 41.7
California 10,262 487.3 72.4 309 3.8 7.7 13.7 25.2
Colorado 486 223.3 77.1 296 2.5 5.1 8.0 16.7
Connecticut 908 71.1 69.0 304 4.2 8.5 13.7 23.3
Delaware 309 89.5 64.2 392 3.6 13.6 22.3 40.5
Florida 371 157.5 67.4 633 25.3 43.4 57.1 72.8
Georgia 1,309 80.9 60.6 479 14.4 28.9 42.6 59.7
Idaho 1,796 285.6 75.1 307 5.4 10.0 14.8 24.2
Illinois 5,163 54.8 66.6 314 3.3 7.7 13.7 26.2
Indiana 3,950 45.7 65.6 375 9.3 17.2 27.0 39.5
Iowa 10,158 48.4 68.0 316 5.0 10.0 16.7 29.3
Kansas 2,660 57.1 64.8 372 9.9 18.4 26.7 39.8
Kentucky 1,827 48.2 60.8 419 12.9 22.4 32.8 49.5
Louisiana 560 55.6 55.1 498 23.4 37.9 50.2 65.0
Maine 1,202 53.9 64.2 282 2.9 7.0 12.8 23.2
Maryland 3,887 66.2 63.7 345 5.4 11.5 19.2 32.7
Massachusetts 951 61.5 65.9 316 2.1 7.0 16.3 26.1
Michigan 7,970 71.2 73.1 313 6.0 11.2 18.1 29.7
Minnesota 28,952 57.1 68.1 353 6.6 13.7 22.8 37.1
Mississippi 516 81.9 63.2 480 13.0 26.6 41.9 61.6
Missouri 3,842 42.5 59.6 395 8.8 16.3 24.6 37.3
Montana 468 95.3 73.8 236 0.6 1.9 4.1 8.1
Nebraska 1,963 65.5 67.4 382 8.4 15.4 23.7 36.9
Nevada 133 329.7 70.6 417 8.3 12.0 16.5 31.6
New Hampshire 939 67.0 70.6 263 2.7 6.7 11.2 21.0
New Jersey 580 64.5 67.3 365 5.7 12.9 24.1 40.3
New Mexico 278 575.7 75.0 311 1.4 5.0 8.6 25.5
New York 22,430 69.0 68.9 285 4.2 8.3 14.2 24.9
North Carolina 2,009 82.2 66.0 414 11.8 21.8 33.9 51.4
North Dakota 485 63.6 65.8 287 3.9 8.9 14.6 20.6
Ohio 9,661 58.2 65.0 327 6.0 11.8 19.0 31.2
Oklahoma 696 63.5 61.3 356 6.3 11.4 20.0 34.9
Oregon 2,498 124.5 70.4 260 3.0 6.2 9.2 15.3
Pennsylvania 44,975 43.5 66.8 346 5.7 11.8 19.9 32.9
Puerto Rico 862 60.6 41.6 441 12.3 21.7 31.2 47.6
Rhode Island 52 37.4 64.2 256 0.0 5.8 9.6 17.3
South Carolina 655 123.3 60.3 448 9.3 19.1 35.7 57.7
South Dakota 1,710 56.6 68.0 386 8.2 15.0 23.3 36.4
Tennessee 1,943 55.1 58.9 476 12.2 26.5 41.0 60.4
Texas 1,563 205.7 64.7 364 3.0 6.7 13.8 28.3
Utah 1,664 116.3 73.9 262 2.9 5.6 10.9 20.4
Vermont 3,975 61.4 65.6 280 2.3 5.2 9.8 19.8
Virginia 4,988 79.5 66.0 374 6.1 13.6 24.7 40.2
Washington 2,084 196.9 76.0 253 2.5 4.2 6.2 11.3
West Virginia 525 63.0 60.3 395 8.4 16.8 28.2 43.6
Wisconsin 55,904 53.3 71.8 286 4.7 8.8 14.2 24.2
Wyoming 18 174.1 72.6 289 16.7 27.8 38.9 50.0
United States 251,182 80.5 69.6 319 5.6 11.2 18.4 30.4

1All herd test days with usable records.
2Cows with usable records (less than total cows on test).
3Herd test days with ≥10 usable records.

Table 2. National averages of herd test days for milk yield and SCC of milk by year.

SCC characteristics  
  Herd test days1 Cows2 per herd Average daily milk yield Average SCC Herd test days3 with SCC greater than
Year (no.) (no.) (lbs) (cells/ml, 1000's) 750,000 cells/ml
(%)
600,000 cells/ml
(%)
500,000 cells/ml
(%)
400,000 cells/ml
(%)
1995 265,844 50.0 65.3 304 4.1 9.3 16.0 27.2
1996 255,039 55.5 64.7 308 4.1 9.2 16.1 27.8
1997 287,789 57.4 66.4 314 4.2 9.5 16.6 28.8
1998 283,695 60.8 66.8 318 4.5 10.1 17.8 30.3
1999 273,364 67.0 68.2 311 4.3 9.7 17.1 29.8
2000 260,139 73.3 69.1 316 4.1 9.4 16.8 29.5
2001 244,940 79.1 69.0 322 4.9 10.6 18.2 31.1
20024 267,809 77.5 69.5 320 5.6 11.0 18.1 30.0
2003 251,182 80.5 69.6 319 5.6 11.2 18.4 30.4
Annual trend -2,160 4.1*** 0.7*** 1.8** 0.2** 0.2** 0.3** 0.4**

1All herd test days with usable records.
2Cows with usable records (less than total cows on test).
3Herd test days with ≥10 usable records.
4Summary characteristics for 2002 were recalculated to include more complete data than was available
at the time of initial reporting.
**The linear regression was significant with P ≤ .01
***The linear regression was significant with P ≤ .001